Autor
Palabras clave
Inviolabilidad
vida íntima
vida privada
privacidad del espacio físico
libertad personal
propiedad
libre desarrollo de la personalidad.
Resumen
En este trabajo se analiza el objeto protegido en la norma de derecho fundamental (art. 18.2 CE) y en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional, así como su adecuación a los diferentes escenarios —pasados y presentes— en los que se despliega. Se verifica que el objeto protegido es la inviolabilidad del espacio físico, con independencia del carácter más o menos íntimo o privado de lo que acontece o anida en él. Asimismo, se evidencia una jurisprudencia constitucional más vinculada al destino del espacio físico —desarrollo de vida íntima o privada— que a su cualidad de inviolable. Se propone reformular el objeto iusfundamental con el fin de garantizar una protección que alcance todos los espacios definidos como inviolables, con independencia de su destino o la existencia efectiva de vida íntima o privada en ellos.
Keywords
Inviolability; privacy; privacy of physical space; personal freedom; property; free development of personality.
Abstract
This work analyzes the object protected in article 18.2 CE and in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court. Likewise, it verifies its adequacy to the different scenarios —past and present— in which it is applied. It is concluded that the protected object is the inviolability of the physical space, regardless of the more or less intimate or private character of what happens or what nests in such space; also regardless that nothing happens or is contained in it.
Likewise, a restrictive constitutional jurisprudence that protects the physical spaces in which intimate or private life takes place is revealed. In this sense, not all inviolable spaces are protected. It is proposed to reformulate the fundamental object enunciated in art. 18.2 CE in order to guarantee a more real and effective protection that reaches all spaces that are inviolable. This regardless of whether their natural destiny is not development of intimate life in them, or regardless of the effective existence of intimate or private life.
Likewise, a restrictive constitutional jurisprudence that protects the physical spaces in which intimate or private life takes place is revealed. In this sense, not all inviolable spaces are protected. It is proposed to reformulate the fundamental object enunciated in art. 18.2 CE in order to guarantee a more real and effective protection that reaches all spaces that are inviolable. This regardless of whether their natural destiny is not development of intimate life in them, or regardless of the effective existence of intimate or private life.