Autor
Palabras clave
estado de alarma
Recurso efectivo
Recurso de amparo
Tribunal Constitucional
Tribunal Supremo.
Resumen
El presente trabajo intenta dilucidar si el ciudadano español ha dispuesto de un recurso real y efectivo para discutir la constitucionalidad o legalidad del Real Decreto 463/2020, de 14 de marzo, por el que se declara el estado de alarma y los reales decretos de prórroga del estado de alarma decretado. La jurisprudencia del Tribunal Supremo y del Tribunal Constitucional podrían conducir a la imposibilidad de controlar jurídicamente la declaración del estado de alarma. Es una exigencia del Estado de derecho y del principio de recurso efectivo entender que, a la vista de la regulación del estado de alarma que realizaron el Real Decreto 463/2020 y los que acordaron la prórroga del mismo, la posible vulneración de derechos fundamentales de modo directo por los mencionados reales decretos hubiera sido susceptible de ser planteada en recurso de amparo ante el Tribunal Constitucional.
Keywords
State of alarm; effective remedy; amparo appeal; Constitutional Court; Supreme Court.
Abstract
The present work seeks to ascertain if the Spanish citizen has had a real and effective remedy to question the constitutionality or legality of the Royal Decree 463/2020, of March 14, by which the state of alarm was declared and the Royal Decrees that agreed to its extension. Supreme Court´s and Constitutional Court´s case law could lead to the inability of exerting legal control of the declaration of the state of alarm. It is a requirement of the rule of law and of the principle of the right to an effective remedy to understand that, in view of the regulation of the state of alarm carried out by Royal Decree 463/2020 and those that agreed to its extension, the possible violation of fundamental rights by the aforementioned Royal Decrees should have been susceptible of being raised in an amparo appeal before the Constitutional Court.